A boxing legend's controversial take on Oleksandr Usyk's legacy has sparked debate among fans. While many consider Usyk one of the greatest heavyweights ever, a Hall of Fame inductee, James Toney, disagrees.
Usyk's impressive resume speaks for itself: a two-time undisputed heavyweight champion, defeating the likes of Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua. He also dominated the cruiserweight division and won Olympic gold in 2012. But Toney, a three-weight world champion himself, downplays Usyk's achievements.
"He's average, not great," Toney asserts. "None of these fighters are all-time greats. It's not like my era; they don't fight the best. You become great by facing great opponents."
Toney's era, the 1990s and 2000s, saw him dominate middleweight, super middleweight, and cruiserweight divisions, defeating legends like Mike McCallum and Iran Barkley. He even fought at heavyweight, beating Evander Holyfield and winning the WBA title against John Ruiz, though the latter was later ruled a no-contest due to a failed drug test.
Toney's comments have divided opinions. Some agree with his assessment, arguing that Usyk's opponents haven't been tough enough. Others defend Usyk, citing his dominance and the fact that he holds multiple heavyweight titles.
"But here's the twist," Toney adds. "Usyk might just prove me wrong. He's still the WBC, WBA, and IBF heavyweight champion, and if he keeps winning, I might have to eat my words."
And this is where it gets interesting: Usyk's next opponent is rumored to be a surprise, which could further shape his legacy and potentially change Toney's mind.
So, who do you think is right? Is Usyk an all-time great, or is he overrated? Let us know in the comments!
